Monday, January 26, 2009

Pokemon Cards Original 150



Saturday, January 10, 2009

Mod Mount And Blade Build Fort

MOGGI ORDERED. FOR LACK OF CRIMES

RENATO FARINA
from Free to Friday, January 9, 2009

Moggi Father: eighteen months imprisonment. Moggi Son: fourteen months. If there had been around a Moggi Holy Spirit also saddled him about a year to him. The others: acquitted. The sensational investigation Roman rule was the existence of football as a mafia system dominated by Moggi's over in the sports bar condannuccia offenses: domestic violence and threats. In fact Moggi father (and a bit 'the son) would have forced a player to play to earn a salary increase, and they would know another coach who did not want him and if he did not accept the transfer would end up in the stands. (It did not take the charge instead of the horrible player Fabrizio Miccoli, who had pleaded with the judges because a Once the team had forgotten to coaches: perhaps it was necessary for a conviction at least leave him to a highway).

forgot warning: undress for a moment of colored scarves of their football team membership. I found it hard too: they are written inside the club. I remain convinced that Juventus have stolen two league championships, as did AC Milan and Rome, since the days of Mussolini, but the inter se is deserved them all, even when Italo Allodi took care of the arbitrators in the car of Herrera. But enough of that. Here's half a tragedy.

I have read and reread the interception, I followed the process. I speak Luciano Moggi: I could not bear it, like any self-respecting Inter. But if the penalty is not here, not there. And it was packed, before any serious assessment of the facts in the Striped Pajamas offenders. It should be so. From time to time the boar is offering, to start again worse than before. But civilization is not to say that you do. Instead, once again you are done. It is the beast lying on the plank, but then just could not cut the throat of an absolute result of the absence of evidence and clues. So we decided to save face justice, who has spent mountains of money, to hurt a Moggi tantinello the cheek. So those who want to complain? Question Moggi. It is bad by definition mythology. Sacrifice him that we should be done callus. Obvious: For the Good of the Cause. On the contrary: the Causes. That the caste courts. And the moralizing of the football, especially the good sportswriters, who glimpsed a world held the reins from their articles to bleach. The results will be, going forward in this manner, the ruined because of the judiciary and the murder of football just to get rid of Moggi.

Six cross for those who have good head
here I try to produce some ideas do not say, do not overdo it, but some cross for those who have a good head.

1) This process was based on an imposing interception ever, published and dramatized on television as smoke prior to pre-order the guilt. No matter what c'entrino: there are, they create the aura of the monster. More witnesses. Here they come. The main accuser was a leader of Rome, then finished at Real Madrid and finally to England, Franco Baldini. He is to report the system Moggi-Gea. And to bring the alleged smoking gun: the case of Giorgio Chiellini, today in Italy. According to Baldini then back to Rome would have ended, but the president of Livorno's said ... I realize that I am entering into details. I stop. Gossip is an obvious personal grudge sufficient to establish that there was a mafia, a web of slavery? It was not credible. We were then to accuse prosecutors, but it was clear that prevailed envy and perhaps the desire to take out the competition at the hands of judges. There were also football players, over the sad case of Miccoli, who denounced such awful violence: "If you do not sign, you're going to play in the garden of your house." Mamma mia.

2) Even the prosecutor has implicitly acknowledged that the acquittal of the charge of conspiracy had gone to pieces. He had to admit: "The players did not cooperate, they are part of the system." But how? It was precisely the system that had to last out Moggi. If anything the fact that so many players, while motivated by the Gazzetta dello Sport and the leaders of the new type, have refused to supply proof of the allegations that this process was a vanity fair accusation. They agreed to adapt to the new course. Instead they were loyal. What is the point of attack for more conspiratorial as estimated by a pm? If you have evidence to pursue. If not shut up.

3) How do you not understand that it was "required" at least a little punishment? He had moved the world. General acquittal would eventually reveal the absurdity of money and energy dissipation of Justice to examine the pinzillacchere. And here's the condannuccia. We have no doubt the good faith and competence technical and moral of the court of Rome. But if you review the episodes in slow motion, the penalty whistled against Moggi was not there and did not deserve expulsion. Maybe the referees (the court), it certainly honest and prepared, will inevitably suffer - stuff unconscious - a psychological subjection to the dominant powers. If they had accepted as proof of the errors of the referees (football), and the complications of contract (the players) to document the existence of a dome, the new leaders should pursue the Mafia. Since errors and complications persist. So what? Here is the minicondanna.

4) Violence. Let us examine the cases of players-victims (alleged). Nicola Amoruso (Torino striker present). At the end of the season 2001-2002 Carlo Ancelotti does not want to know more to Juventus. Moggi Amoruso calls and says you do not have space here, you may wish to accept the transfer to Perugia, otherwise you end up in the stands and not playing. Amoruso finally agrees, and he gets a well aumentone salary. It is violence, and threats? Harassment against a billionaire? But it should be '. Another case. Manuele Blasi (Napoli midfielder today). Juve lends to Parma. There he tests positive for doping: eight-month suspension. He returned to Juventus in the summer of 2003, not quite in full regalia. And now Stefano Antonelli, on behalf of Blasi, incredibly calls: he wants his client to increase and extension of the contract. Moggi says nothing to do, you do not speak, before the young man must prove on the field to earn money and new contract. The median play well, get one and the other thing. Testify in favor of Moggi. The court instead takes seriously the testimony of Antonelli.

birth to a "moggiolino"
5) The ruling says that Moggi is not the Godfather. It ends up supporting the then sporting director of Juventus at the end acted - according to their exaggerating with words - only in the interest of Juventus: obeying the coach (Carlo Ancelotti has testified at the trial) and allowing for savings on salary. Even as you are teaching the players in the world. It would be easy to be generous with other people's money. Now Juventus should propose it for a medal, instead of downloading it. But the Football League and the Football Association should defend it. Is inherent in the ruling set a dangerous precedent for all football clubs: say no to a player, you should explain that - not for peanuts - change team can become the cause of prison sentence. It means that the players as well as being owners of bank accounts, blackmail millionaires will have a formidable team around. Next, we expect a bunch of complaints.

6) Reflection extra-Mogg. It was obvious, however, would come to a conviction. Such is the objective link that binds the prosecutors and trial courts, which work in the same building and belong to the same review and respond to the same CSM, which is inevitably a lot of noise when printing and a lot of money spent in the investigation, leads to a rejection at least a little, or perform and part prescribe (see Andreotti). In this way the huge machine at least can claim to have given birth to a moggiolino.

It should be clear to everyone that the separation of the careers of judges, or you have to wait for another job in football, one in Naples?

Sunday, January 4, 2009

Women's Breast Being Cut Off

THE TRUE STORY OF PASSPORT Recoba

The false document was paid eighty thousand U.S. dollars: the upper management had been informed by Oriali
Free From the October 18, 2006

publish excerpts from the ruling of the Disciplinary Committee of the Football League for the "fake passport case Recoba, 27 June 2001 which established the following penalties: suspension until June 30, 2002 by Alvaro Recoba, inhibition until 30 June 2002 Gabriele Oriali, inhibition until 31 March 2002, Franco Baldini, in addition to a fine of two billion dollars for the Nerazzurri. But this is only the first act in the intricate story. The penalty for the player was confirmed by the Commission and federal appeals reduced to four months by the Chamber of Conciliation cones (fine for the company reduced to only 1.4 billion lire). On May 25, 2006 Recoba Oriali have bargained and six months' imprisonment (replaced by a fine of € 21,420) in a criminal court, rejected the request by the investigating magistrate of the Court of Udine. The survey, divided into several strands, thirty-one people were involved, including twelve players from AC Milan, Roma, Lazio, Sampdoria, Udinese and Vicenza. Www.legacalcio.it/comun/0001/cu507 on the site can be found, for all concerned with the matter, the official press release in its entirety.

The premise requires an examination of the substance in order be responsible for the subject-matter of this Commission, which may not directly relate to the authenticity or counterfeit passport of Italian football player Alvaro Recoba Rivero apparently issued by the Police in Rome November 9, 1998, as such a matter of course reserved for the criminal court. By the case circumstances arise unambiguous, consistent and incontrovertible that allow you to say (even apart from the relief, deduced from the documents acquired and shown in the act of referral, that the passport of Italian football is not never been issued by the Police in Rome) Recoba that had no title to the release of an Italian passport for absolute non-existence in the hands of the same prerequisites, first and foremost the right to Italian citizenship. At such a conclusion is reached, even at the moment of silence for any evidence and logical arguments that will be studied by examining the individual positions of the accused on the basis of only the statements made by the player Bureau surveys and the public prosecutor of Udine. In summary, Recoba said to have taken into account for the first time the possibility of becoming EU citizen on his return from the international after a period spent on loan at Venezia. On that occasion, he asked about your father who's pointed out that the family had "ancestors in the Canary Islands." Research in that direction, first by an aide to the prosecutor Casal, that Daniel Delgado, and then by a English law firm mandated by the International Soc, not arrived at any result: the fact Recoba reports that the search was "long and difficult." The player has also ruled out ever having played any practice or any request submitted tending to the release of an Italian passport. BENEFITS FOR ILLEGAL PLAYER does not have to spend more words to conclude that the Italian passport delivered to Recoba in Rome in September 1999 did not correspond to either the nationality of which the Uruguayan player was in possession of his birth or to the English that he might have been able to achieve "jure sanguinis", where the research conducted for the detection of Spain English ancestors had been successful. And subjectively it can also safely say that in no case the player could have confidence in the veracity "ideological" Italian passport that was delivered to Borghesiana dall'Oriali September 12, 1999. In general terms, and subject to the determination of individual responsibility, it is undeniable that the use of such a passport in order to obtain the change in federal status of the player, knowing that the document could not be genuine because citizenship is not incompatible with Recoba's Italian, constitutes a serious violation of the principles of loyalty, honesty and rectitude to which compliance is required all recipients of federal rules, as Article. 1 paragraph 1 of the CGS is to use means in fact incorrect, or even fraudulent, in order to obtain recognition of a security payable to, obtaining an unfair advantage. It is unnecessary to emphasize in this regard that the fact of becoming a "Community" has brought economic benefits not only is the player, at least in terms of absolute freedom of movement within the Federation of affiliated community, both to employer for better utilization of staff available (...). Passing the examination of individual positions, there is no doubt on the statement of responsibility for Alvaro Recoba Rivero. It has been said that the documents can not be inferred no valid reason that would allow the player to believe in authenticity of an Italian passport in question and, in particular, does not deserve any credit the assertion of Recoba, by claiming it has not detected the fault of the issue date of the document, almost a year earlier than at the time of delivery of same Oriali part of, or when he has not noticed that the passport had been given a residence in Rome never existed, much less when he said did not give any weight to the fact that the passport was applied to a photograph which he had no remember and that he was still having delivered to anyone. The involvement of BALDINI The defense argued that the conduct of Recoba parted should be considered in view of its inexperience and naivety, due to age youth, and the lack of knowledge on his part regarding any laws, regulations, administrative practices and bureaucratic, all these elements that show the ignorance about the unlawfulness of his affiliation as a federal city Community. According to the Commission the alleged unawareness of Recoba is irretrievably contradicted by the facts mentioned above, whose relevance can not be resisted and refused only on grounds of age of the player. And 'well-known fact, and the file shows that Recoba, though undeniably young, he has gained experience in various fields through travel and intercontinental travel, contract negotiations of economic contacts with prosecutors and sports activities also in the specific field of the acquisition of a particular nationality (see information at the request of his father, custody of a law firm to practice English). Therefore there Recoba in the intelligence, maturity and experience necessary to understand that passports do not materialize out of nowhere and that the transformation of its federal status in extra-Community was irregular. The shocking carelessness with which Recoba, although "astonished" that it had obtained an Italian passport, he has served as suited him acquire the status of the Community assume, in light of the above carried out, meaning a decisive evidence for the ascertainment of active and fully aware of the affiliated to the creation of the offense. As regards Mr. Gabriele Oriali the file shows that those at the beginning of cooperation with the international in June 1999, he learned that the Company had an interest in the change of status from non-EU Recoba in the Community and to that end had been interested in a English law firm, whose research had stalled, however, are practices that required complicated in any case, very long time. It is also clear that the Oriali Recoba was interested in the issue by taking concrete initiatives aimed at achieving change in the status of the player, by contacting the Baldini to know "as they did to Rome for passports and ask an indication of someone who could help change the international status" of Recoba. Baldini took the name of the Krausz (which he also already known), the Oriali was activated for the start of "practice", then follow the course until the end. He provided then deliver to Recoba, 12 September 1999, an Italian passport which had just been provided by Krausz. Paid dell'Oriali serious elements of the accusation, made up of facts and logical arguments deductible established by the acts, so precise, articulate and compelling responsibility to demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt. In particular: a) the Oriali was to receive a passport by Krausz. Before giving to Recoba, he was able to examine it and noted that the date of issue dates back to November 9, 1998, almost one year before the day of delivery. The fact is confirmed by Krausz, whose testimony is deemed reliable Investigations Bureau, to have been released voluntarily by a person not licensed and therefore not obliged to provide information to federal FIGC. The explanation for this anomaly, Krausz says that it provided all'Oriali ("Commenting on the fact that the passport was issued with an earlier date but I was explained by the fact that these are documents part of a group "devoted to specific cases") is symptomatic of dell'Oriali awareness regarding the irregularities in the issuing of passports b) Oriali also had occasion to note, looking at the passport, the document that Recoba was living in Rome, which was not to be false, and that the passport was applied a photograph of Recoba of which he "knew nothing", c) was to instruct the Oriali Krausz of holding the "practice" in Argentina and to authorize, after obtained the consent of the Company, payment of the sum of $ 80,000 alleged (see the statements on the verge of Krausz) by Liliana Rocca as a reward for obtaining passsaporto d) was the Oriali to promote a meeting with Baldwin, in the presence of Ghelfi, during which Baldwin was asked to take full responsibility for the operation, and to issue an invoice to your name cost "of the operation Recoba," and ) the Oriali, being aware of previous unsuccessful attempts carried out in Spain for the achievement of EU citizenship of the player, could not have confidence in the fairness and regularity of an Italian passport for Recoba obtained in Argentina from an unspecified "agency", in lightning-fast times to say the least, since he knew that by Recoba was not presented to the Italian authorities any request to issue a passport. Nor could he, based on logic and common experience, consider the series and based general insurance provided to him by Krausz and smoky, even by Baldini, that "everything was smooth." The statement dell'incolpato, he was not aware of the alleged illegality of the document and that he doubted the correctness of the persons to whom it was entrusted, on behalf of the International Soc, conducting the "practice" is reduced to a mere allegation no effective defensive response, which does not affect in any way the complete and convincing evidence assembled against him under. Must therefore be affirmed disciplinary liability of Mr. Gabriele Oriali. With regard to Mr. Franco Baldini is common ground in which these acts dall'Oriali was asked, who asked him if he knew a person in a position to verify the existence of the prerequisites for change of status from non-EU Recoba in the Community. The Baldini would show the Krausz (who already knew personally Oriali) is considered suitable to the task because they had previously dealt with similar events, and because of that his wife worked with a law firm in Argentina. After having addressed the Oriali Krausz, the Baldini would no longer directly involved in the case, merely on a few occasions to act as intermediaries between Krausz and Oriali, since the same had difficulty contacting each other. The defense argued that the marginal activity Baldini, limitatasi the "presentation" to Oriali Krausz (except for sporadic and insignificant actions of a mere link between the two) it would exclude the involvement in the case of the passport Recoba. The Commission notes that the documents are illustrated numerous and consistent circumstances leading to the conviction that Baldini had a role in the story much more relevant and easy to efficientedi through. In particular: a) between Baldini and Krausz, there was a relationship, in the sense that the former had offered the second in a time of economic difficulty, the opportunity to collaborate with his office, having lived in Argentina where un'argentina married, b) Baldini, precisely because of the relationship described above, was well aware of the nature of the practices carried out by Krausz in Argentina, the inconsistency of the vaunted knowledge and experience in agencies and consulates and touted as possible action by the wife in the role of collaborators a law firm (the Krausz said he found the address of a "serious agency" through leaflets distributed for publicity purposes, in front of a Consulate and never made any mention of an involvement of his wife the story), c) the file shows that Baldwin was an ongoing point of reference for the conduct of "practice" by providing to the documentation for Recoba Krausz, the sorting and fax communications between Oriali Krausz and finally - a fact somewhat symptomatic - talking to Oriali, about 45/60 days after first contact, that the research was positive and that everything was in place for the Community to become Recoba - Al regarding the alleged diffi CT telephone contact between the Oriali Krausz and Krausz are not credible because the reports that he telephoned directly to Oriali to keep him informed of developments in practice on several occasions, not least regarding the request of the bank. One can deduce logically that the important news, as was undoubtedly that of "completion of the research," had to go through the Baldini and remain with the latter communicate all'Oriali d) Oriali turned to Baldini Krausz and not to ensure that "everything was regular and Baldini was to provide the necessary assurances, and) in May 2000, Baldwin was summoned to an interview with Oriali and Ghelfi, during which he was asked to assume all responsibilities of the passport charge Recoba and even in its own name its performance. This attempt to Baldwin's involvement on the part of the international would clearly have no logical justification, though he was limited to "hijack" Oriali to Krausz. Nor does it seem credible version defensive about the motivations of almost reverential respect which led Baldwin to accept the interview, however, the with representatives of the International. Based on the foregoing, the Commission considers that it should be declared the responsibility of Baldini, are fully tested the direct and conscious involvement in the creation of the offense and the effectiveness of causal put in place to achieve the end. LIABILITY FOR inter Mr. Rinaldo Ghelfi, CEO of the International Soc, is alleged participation in unlawful conduct initiated by the Society of its card holders, and Recoba Oriali in competition with Baldwin and with third parties who are not registered. Moreover, the findings of investigations carried out in the results of direct intervention in the affair Ghelfi until May 2000, when it had become public knowledge, the reports of possible irregularities concerning the achievement of the status of the Community by the Lazio player Veron. The Ghelfi, wanting to be sure that there were anomalies in the similar practice of Recoba, asked for clarification Oriali known and participated in the meeting with the same Oriali and Baldini. Ghelfi of such conduct, by itself, does not appear significant disciplinary action, either because they occurred in the period following the amendment of the "status" of Recoba, either because it lacks probative value as to the significant and unique Ghelfi awareness about the irregularity of the position of Recoba. On this occasion there are certainly strong doubts, since Oriali - not being active for the passport of Recoba as a mere staff - must have held upper management informed of the steps. The file shows that at least two times Oriali must have consulted with their superiors: the first when it comes to the "way" to practice in Argentina and the second when it came to perform on the advice of Krausz, the transfer of $ 80,000 , to be approved by top management. That said, it is clear that the request for payment of a sum relevant to the conduct of research documents could and perhaps should, lead to the leaders of the suspected irregularities and on the other hand the absence in the books of the Company a payment of that amount could mean that the settlement of compensation have been provided on a non-official, which would be a further indication of liabilities for dell'Oriali referents. According to the documents, however, can not be inferred that any circumstances refer to Ghelfi, so clear and unequivocal consent for the adoption of such decision, not being able to absolutely exclude the possibility that other entities have done so in those terms. The Commission therefore considers that Mr. Rinaldo Ghelfi should be acquitted of the charge. The Soc international meets and the work of its licensed Recoba Oriali under strict liability, which may not any evidence of the allegations made by the same good faith.

Saturday, January 3, 2009

How To Remove Virus Without Antivirus

THE WEIGHT OF ADRIANO



Friday, January 2, 2009

Amitriptyline For Insomnia Does It Work

DREAM TEAM

Move your mouse over the image without clicking