From Free-News.it
of Tuesday, December 23, 2008
Luciano Moggi
few years ago, Juventus was favored by an error and won against Verona Chievo: error much less clear what happened inside of the transfer of Siena. "Sometimes," then newspaper headlined: "Scandal in Verona." For the interaction of Siena Rose was the title of "A Maicon's too much," as if to say, sometimes, the information following the wave of ... typhus.
Until now, no one had seen or heard Moratti, no one has heard pontificating, as he always liked to do. Disappeared from TV. After the little help that last year allowed inside to overcome the Rome final day with goals from Ibrahimovic Santo, now the gift basket of Siena, the regalone Christmas, the three-point goal from Maicon on the pilfered, with a offside bigger than a house, had disappeared. Vain expectation that the alleged large (up to a couple of years ago) did you live in some way to have your opinion about, the vain conceit that the powerful boss drops to apologize for a win to Siena undeserved. That would have been nice to hear that "this is not just our victory, we want to redo the game." But no: what a disappointment.
help and silences
It took the Assembly yesterday to see him again, looking perky, reciting the same old rhyme of "good faith" today's arbitration instead of "bad faith of the past." But those who believe in more? Those who have gone to Siena Inter are the same ones that were wrong in the past (Griselli and Calcagno), and if wrong in the past in favor of Juventus were in bad faith, but now that they do wrong to favor the interaction in good faith?
Be quieter the president of Inter. I do not mean that the "beloved" has been helped by science. These are inventions that belong to others, including himself and first. Various errors and help were always there, and the only thing that varies is the interpretation that they are given. It is now very fashionable to talk about good faith. They are all ready to say that the psychological subjection there, only to notice (he did also Sacchi) is that the powerful looked at in another way and that the expense is always small. I must say thanks to Maurizio Mosca that in a debate on bad day for referees (or assistants, but little change) has had the courage to ask the audience to Controcampo defiantly what one would have said if these errors were still interested in Juve Moggi.
The truth comes out though with difficulty, the same Moscow added with high tone and severe "On that Juve have been spewed for years suspected of cheating", that is wrong. In the past there have never been neither conspiracy nor machine, because otherwise if there had been before, there would be today. And so it is not. And as I must also say on the subject of careful and always pugnacious Mughini who said he wanted to review the eavesdropping, "not those of bar talk, but at least one show where someone has been corrupted". I pose this question to Moratti and at the same time I point out that the only company at that time had direct contact with an umpire in the international business was. I hope that these glimpses of truth illuminate even those who, for bias, from his ear just do not want to hear.
of Tuesday, December 23, 2008
Luciano Moggi
few years ago, Juventus was favored by an error and won against Verona Chievo: error much less clear what happened inside of the transfer of Siena. "Sometimes," then newspaper headlined: "Scandal in Verona." For the interaction of Siena Rose was the title of "A Maicon's too much," as if to say, sometimes, the information following the wave of ... typhus.
Until now, no one had seen or heard Moratti, no one has heard pontificating, as he always liked to do. Disappeared from TV. After the little help that last year allowed inside to overcome the Rome final day with goals from Ibrahimovic Santo, now the gift basket of Siena, the regalone Christmas, the three-point goal from Maicon on the pilfered, with a offside bigger than a house, had disappeared. Vain expectation that the alleged large (up to a couple of years ago) did you live in some way to have your opinion about, the vain conceit that the powerful boss drops to apologize for a win to Siena undeserved. That would have been nice to hear that "this is not just our victory, we want to redo the game." But no: what a disappointment.
help and silences
It took the Assembly yesterday to see him again, looking perky, reciting the same old rhyme of "good faith" today's arbitration instead of "bad faith of the past." But those who believe in more? Those who have gone to Siena Inter are the same ones that were wrong in the past (Griselli and Calcagno), and if wrong in the past in favor of Juventus were in bad faith, but now that they do wrong to favor the interaction in good faith?
Be quieter the president of Inter. I do not mean that the "beloved" has been helped by science. These are inventions that belong to others, including himself and first. Various errors and help were always there, and the only thing that varies is the interpretation that they are given. It is now very fashionable to talk about good faith. They are all ready to say that the psychological subjection there, only to notice (he did also Sacchi) is that the powerful looked at in another way and that the expense is always small. I must say thanks to Maurizio Mosca that in a debate on bad day for referees (or assistants, but little change) has had the courage to ask the audience to Controcampo defiantly what one would have said if these errors were still interested in Juve Moggi.
The truth comes out though with difficulty, the same Moscow added with high tone and severe "On that Juve have been spewed for years suspected of cheating", that is wrong. In the past there have never been neither conspiracy nor machine, because otherwise if there had been before, there would be today. And so it is not. And as I must also say on the subject of careful and always pugnacious Mughini who said he wanted to review the eavesdropping, "not those of bar talk, but at least one show where someone has been corrupted". I pose this question to Moratti and at the same time I point out that the only company at that time had direct contact with an umpire in the international business was. I hope that these glimpses of truth illuminate even those who, for bias, from his ear just do not want to hear.
0 comments:
Post a Comment