RENATO FARINA from Free to Friday, January 9, 2009
Moggi Father: eighteen months imprisonment. Moggi Son: fourteen months. If there had been around a Moggi Holy Spirit also saddled him about a year to him. The others: acquitted. The sensational investigation Roman rule was the existence of football as a mafia system dominated by Moggi's over in the sports bar condannuccia offenses: domestic violence and threats. In fact Moggi father (and a bit 'the son) would have forced a player to play to earn a salary increase, and they would know another coach who did not want him and if he did not accept the transfer would end up in the stands. (It did not take the charge instead of the horrible player Fabrizio Miccoli, who had pleaded with the judges because a Once the team had forgotten to coaches: perhaps it was necessary for a conviction at least leave him to a highway).
Moggi Father: eighteen months imprisonment. Moggi Son: fourteen months. If there had been around a Moggi Holy Spirit also saddled him about a year to him. The others: acquitted. The sensational investigation Roman rule was the existence of football as a mafia system dominated by Moggi's over in the sports bar condannuccia offenses: domestic violence and threats. In fact Moggi father (and a bit 'the son) would have forced a player to play to earn a salary increase, and they would know another coach who did not want him and if he did not accept the transfer would end up in the stands. (It did not take the charge instead of the horrible player Fabrizio Miccoli, who had pleaded with the judges because a Once the team had forgotten to coaches: perhaps it was necessary for a conviction at least leave him to a highway).
forgot warning: undress for a moment of colored scarves of their football team membership. I found it hard too: they are written inside the club. I remain convinced that Juventus have stolen two league championships, as did AC Milan and Rome, since the days of Mussolini, but the inter se is deserved them all, even when Italo Allodi took care of the arbitrators in the car of Herrera. But enough of that. Here's half a tragedy.
I have read and reread the interception, I followed the process. I speak Luciano Moggi: I could not bear it, like any self-respecting Inter. But if the penalty is not here, not there. And it was packed, before any serious assessment of the facts in the Striped Pajamas offenders. It should be so. From time to time the boar is offering, to start again worse than before. But civilization is not to say that you do. Instead, once again you are done. It is the beast lying on the plank, but then just could not cut the throat of an absolute result of the absence of evidence and clues. So we decided to save face justice, who has spent mountains of money, to hurt a Moggi tantinello the cheek. So those who want to complain? Question Moggi. It is bad by definition mythology. Sacrifice him that we should be done callus. Obvious: For the Good of the Cause. On the contrary: the Causes. That the caste courts. And the moralizing of the football, especially the good sportswriters, who glimpsed a world held the reins from their articles to bleach. The results will be, going forward in this manner, the ruined because of the judiciary and the murder of football just to get rid of Moggi.
Six cross for those who have good head
here I try to produce some ideas do not say, do not overdo it, but some cross for those who have a good head.
1) This process was based on an imposing interception ever, published and dramatized on television as smoke prior to pre-order the guilt. No matter what c'entrino: there are, they create the aura of the monster. More witnesses. Here they come. The main accuser was a leader of Rome, then finished at Real Madrid and finally to England, Franco Baldini. He is to report the system Moggi-Gea. And to bring the alleged smoking gun: the case of Giorgio Chiellini, today in Italy. According to Baldini then back to Rome would have ended, but the president of Livorno's said ... I realize that I am entering into details. I stop. Gossip is an obvious personal grudge sufficient to establish that there was a mafia, a web of slavery? It was not credible. We were then to accuse prosecutors, but it was clear that prevailed envy and perhaps the desire to take out the competition at the hands of judges. There were also football players, over the sad case of Miccoli, who denounced such awful violence: "If you do not sign, you're going to play in the garden of your house." Mamma mia.
2) Even the prosecutor has implicitly acknowledged that the acquittal of the charge of conspiracy had gone to pieces. He had to admit: "The players did not cooperate, they are part of the system." But how? It was precisely the system that had to last out Moggi. If anything the fact that so many players, while motivated by the Gazzetta dello Sport and the leaders of the new type, have refused to supply proof of the allegations that this process was a vanity fair accusation. They agreed to adapt to the new course. Instead they were loyal. What is the point of attack for more conspiratorial as estimated by a pm? If you have evidence to pursue. If not shut up.
3) How do you not understand that it was "required" at least a little punishment? He had moved the world. General acquittal would eventually reveal the absurdity of money and energy dissipation of Justice to examine the pinzillacchere. And here's the condannuccia. We have no doubt the good faith and competence technical and moral of the court of Rome. But if you review the episodes in slow motion, the penalty whistled against Moggi was not there and did not deserve expulsion. Maybe the referees (the court), it certainly honest and prepared, will inevitably suffer - stuff unconscious - a psychological subjection to the dominant powers. If they had accepted as proof of the errors of the referees (football), and the complications of contract (the players) to document the existence of a dome, the new leaders should pursue the Mafia. Since errors and complications persist. So what? Here is the minicondanna.
4) Violence. Let us examine the cases of players-victims (alleged). Nicola Amoruso (Torino striker present). At the end of the season 2001-2002 Carlo Ancelotti does not want to know more to Juventus. Moggi Amoruso calls and says you do not have space here, you may wish to accept the transfer to Perugia, otherwise you end up in the stands and not playing. Amoruso finally agrees, and he gets a well aumentone salary. It is violence, and threats? Harassment against a billionaire? But it should be '. Another case. Manuele Blasi (Napoli midfielder today). Juve lends to Parma. There he tests positive for doping: eight-month suspension. He returned to Juventus in the summer of 2003, not quite in full regalia. And now Stefano Antonelli, on behalf of Blasi, incredibly calls: he wants his client to increase and extension of the contract. Moggi says nothing to do, you do not speak, before the young man must prove on the field to earn money and new contract. The median play well, get one and the other thing. Testify in favor of Moggi. The court instead takes seriously the testimony of Antonelli.
birth to a "moggiolino"
5) The ruling says that Moggi is not the Godfather. It ends up supporting the then sporting director of Juventus at the end acted - according to their exaggerating with words - only in the interest of Juventus: obeying the coach (Carlo Ancelotti has testified at the trial) and allowing for savings on salary. Even as you are teaching the players in the world. It would be easy to be generous with other people's money. Now Juventus should propose it for a medal, instead of downloading it. But the Football League and the Football Association should defend it. Is inherent in the ruling set a dangerous precedent for all football clubs: say no to a player, you should explain that - not for peanuts - change team can become the cause of prison sentence. It means that the players as well as being owners of bank accounts, blackmail millionaires will have a formidable team around. Next, we expect a bunch of complaints.
6) Reflection extra-Mogg. It was obvious, however, would come to a conviction. Such is the objective link that binds the prosecutors and trial courts, which work in the same building and belong to the same review and respond to the same CSM, which is inevitably a lot of noise when printing and a lot of money spent in the investigation, leads to a rejection at least a little, or perform and part prescribe (see Andreotti). In this way the huge machine at least can claim to have given birth to a moggiolino.
It should be clear to everyone that the separation of the careers of judges, or you have to wait for another job in football, one in Naples?
0 comments:
Post a Comment