The false document was paid eighty thousand U.S. dollars: the upper management had been informed by Oriali
Free From the October 18, 2006
publish excerpts from the ruling of the Disciplinary Committee of the Football League for the "fake passport case Recoba, 27 June 2001 which established the following penalties: suspension until June 30, 2002 by Alvaro Recoba, inhibition until 30 June 2002 Gabriele Oriali, inhibition until 31 March 2002, Franco Baldini, in addition to a fine of two billion dollars for the Nerazzurri. But this is only the first act in the intricate story. The penalty for the player was confirmed by the Commission and federal appeals reduced to four months by the Chamber of Conciliation cones (fine for the company reduced to only 1.4 billion lire). On May 25, 2006 Recoba Oriali have bargained and six months' imprisonment (replaced by a fine of € 21,420) in a criminal court, rejected the request by the investigating magistrate of the Court of Udine. The survey, divided into several strands, thirty-one people were involved, including twelve players from AC Milan, Roma, Lazio, Sampdoria, Udinese and Vicenza. Www.legacalcio.it/comun/0001/cu507 on the site can be found, for all concerned with the matter, the official press release in its entirety.
The premise requires an examination of the substance in order be responsible for the subject-matter of this Commission, which may not directly relate to the authenticity or counterfeit passport of Italian football player Alvaro Recoba Rivero apparently issued by the Police in Rome November 9, 1998, as such a matter of course reserved for the criminal court. By the case circumstances arise unambiguous, consistent and incontrovertible that allow you to say (even apart from the relief, deduced from the documents acquired and shown in the act of referral, that the passport of Italian football is not never been issued by the Police in Rome) Recoba that had no title to the release of an Italian passport for absolute non-existence in the hands of the same prerequisites, first and foremost the right to Italian citizenship. At such a conclusion is reached, even at the moment of silence for any evidence and logical arguments that will be studied by examining the individual positions of the accused on the basis of only the statements made by the player Bureau surveys and the public prosecutor of Udine. In summary, Recoba said to have taken into account for the first time the possibility of becoming EU citizen on his return from the international after a period spent on loan at Venezia. On that occasion, he asked about your father who's pointed out that the family had "ancestors in the Canary Islands." Research in that direction, first by an aide to the prosecutor Casal, that Daniel Delgado, and then by a English law firm mandated by the International Soc, not arrived at any result: the fact Recoba reports that the search was "long and difficult." The player has also ruled out ever having played any practice or any request submitted tending to the release of an Italian passport. BENEFITS FOR ILLEGAL PLAYER does not have to spend more words to conclude that the Italian passport delivered to Recoba in Rome in September 1999 did not correspond to either the nationality of which the Uruguayan player was in possession of his birth or to the English that he might have been able to achieve "jure sanguinis", where the research conducted for the detection of Spain English ancestors had been successful. And subjectively it can also safely say that in no case the player could have confidence in the veracity "ideological" Italian passport that was delivered to Borghesiana dall'Oriali September 12, 1999. In general terms, and subject to the determination of individual responsibility, it is undeniable that the use of such a passport in order to obtain the change in federal status of the player, knowing that the document could not be genuine because citizenship is not incompatible with Recoba's Italian, constitutes a serious violation of the principles of loyalty, honesty and rectitude to which compliance is required all recipients of federal rules, as Article. 1 paragraph 1 of the CGS is to use means in fact incorrect, or even fraudulent, in order to obtain recognition of a security payable to, obtaining an unfair advantage. It is unnecessary to emphasize in this regard that the fact of becoming a "Community" has brought economic benefits not only is the player, at least in terms of absolute freedom of movement within the Federation of affiliated community, both to employer for better utilization of staff available (...). Passing the examination of individual positions, there is no doubt on the statement of responsibility for Alvaro Recoba Rivero. It has been said that the documents can not be inferred no valid reason that would allow the player to believe in authenticity of an Italian passport in question and, in particular, does not deserve any credit the assertion of Recoba, by claiming it has not detected the fault of the issue date of the document, almost a year earlier than at the time of delivery of same Oriali part of, or when he has not noticed that the passport had been given a residence in Rome never existed, much less when he said did not give any weight to the fact that the passport was applied to a photograph which he had no remember and that he was still having delivered to anyone. The involvement of BALDINI The defense argued that the conduct of Recoba parted should be considered in view of its inexperience and naivety, due to age youth, and the lack of knowledge on his part regarding any laws, regulations, administrative practices and bureaucratic, all these elements that show the ignorance about the unlawfulness of his affiliation as a federal city Community. According to the Commission the alleged unawareness of Recoba is irretrievably contradicted by the facts mentioned above, whose relevance can not be resisted and refused only on grounds of age of the player. And 'well-known fact, and the file shows that Recoba, though undeniably young, he has gained experience in various fields through travel and intercontinental travel, contract negotiations of economic contacts with prosecutors and sports activities also in the specific field of the acquisition of a particular nationality (see information at the request of his father, custody of a law firm to practice English). Therefore there Recoba in the intelligence, maturity and experience necessary to understand that passports do not materialize out of nowhere and that the transformation of its federal status in extra-Community was irregular. The shocking carelessness with which Recoba, although "astonished" that it had obtained an Italian passport, he has served as suited him acquire the status of the Community assume, in light of the above carried out, meaning a decisive evidence for the ascertainment of active and fully aware of the affiliated to the creation of the offense. As regards Mr. Gabriele Oriali the file shows that those at the beginning of cooperation with the international in June 1999, he learned that the Company had an interest in the change of status from non-EU Recoba in the Community and to that end had been interested in a English law firm, whose research had stalled, however, are practices that required complicated in any case, very long time. It is also clear that the Oriali Recoba was interested in the issue by taking concrete initiatives aimed at achieving change in the status of the player, by contacting the Baldini to know "as they did to Rome for passports and ask an indication of someone who could help change the international status" of Recoba. Baldini took the name of the Krausz (which he also already known), the Oriali was activated for the start of "practice", then follow the course until the end. He provided then deliver to Recoba, 12 September 1999, an Italian passport which had just been provided by Krausz. Paid dell'Oriali serious elements of the accusation, made up of facts and logical arguments deductible established by the acts, so precise, articulate and compelling responsibility to demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt. In particular: a) the Oriali was to receive a passport by Krausz. Before giving to Recoba, he was able to examine it and noted that the date of issue dates back to November 9, 1998, almost one year before the day of delivery. The fact is confirmed by Krausz, whose testimony is deemed reliable Investigations Bureau, to have been released voluntarily by a person not licensed and therefore not obliged to provide information to federal FIGC. The explanation for this anomaly, Krausz says that it provided all'Oriali ("Commenting on the fact that the passport was issued with an earlier date but I was explained by the fact that these are documents part of a group "devoted to specific cases") is symptomatic of dell'Oriali awareness regarding the irregularities in the issuing of passports b) Oriali also had occasion to note, looking at the passport, the document that Recoba was living in Rome, which was not to be false, and that the passport was applied a photograph of Recoba of which he "knew nothing", c) was to instruct the Oriali Krausz of holding the "practice" in Argentina and to authorize, after obtained the consent of the Company, payment of the sum of $ 80,000 alleged (see the statements on the verge of Krausz) by Liliana Rocca as a reward for obtaining passsaporto d) was the Oriali to promote a meeting with Baldwin, in the presence of Ghelfi, during which Baldwin was asked to take full responsibility for the operation, and to issue an invoice to your name cost "of the operation Recoba," and ) the Oriali, being aware of previous unsuccessful attempts carried out in Spain for the achievement of EU citizenship of the player, could not have confidence in the fairness and regularity of an Italian passport for Recoba obtained in Argentina from an unspecified "agency", in lightning-fast times to say the least, since he knew that by Recoba was not presented to the Italian authorities any request to issue a passport. Nor could he, based on logic and common experience, consider the series and based general insurance provided to him by Krausz and smoky, even by Baldini, that "everything was smooth." The statement dell'incolpato, he was not aware of the alleged illegality of the document and that he doubted the correctness of the persons to whom it was entrusted, on behalf of the International Soc, conducting the "practice" is reduced to a mere allegation no effective defensive response, which does not affect in any way the complete and convincing evidence assembled against him under. Must therefore be affirmed disciplinary liability of Mr. Gabriele Oriali. With regard to Mr. Franco Baldini is common ground in which these acts dall'Oriali was asked, who asked him if he knew a person in a position to verify the existence of the prerequisites for change of status from non-EU Recoba in the Community. The Baldini would show the Krausz (who already knew personally Oriali) is considered suitable to the task because they had previously dealt with similar events, and because of that his wife worked with a law firm in Argentina. After having addressed the Oriali Krausz, the Baldini would no longer directly involved in the case, merely on a few occasions to act as intermediaries between Krausz and Oriali, since the same had difficulty contacting each other. The defense argued that the marginal activity Baldini, limitatasi the "presentation" to Oriali Krausz (except for sporadic and insignificant actions of a mere link between the two) it would exclude the involvement in the case of the passport Recoba. The Commission notes that the documents are illustrated numerous and consistent circumstances leading to the conviction that Baldini had a role in the story much more relevant and easy to efficientedi through. In particular: a) between Baldini and Krausz, there was a relationship, in the sense that the former had offered the second in a time of economic difficulty, the opportunity to collaborate with his office, having lived in Argentina where un'argentina married, b) Baldini, precisely because of the relationship described above, was well aware of the nature of the practices carried out by Krausz in Argentina, the inconsistency of the vaunted knowledge and experience in agencies and consulates and touted as possible action by the wife in the role of collaborators a law firm (the Krausz said he found the address of a "serious agency" through leaflets distributed for publicity purposes, in front of a Consulate and never made any mention of an involvement of his wife the story), c) the file shows that Baldwin was an ongoing point of reference for the conduct of "practice" by providing to the documentation for Recoba Krausz, the sorting and fax communications between Oriali Krausz and finally - a fact somewhat symptomatic - talking to Oriali, about 45/60 days after first contact, that the research was positive and that everything was in place for the Community to become Recoba - Al regarding the alleged diffi CT telephone contact between the Oriali Krausz and Krausz are not credible because the reports that he telephoned directly to Oriali to keep him informed of developments in practice on several occasions, not least regarding the request of the bank. One can deduce logically that the important news, as was undoubtedly that of "completion of the research," had to go through the Baldini and remain with the latter communicate all'Oriali d) Oriali turned to Baldini Krausz and not to ensure that "everything was regular and Baldini was to provide the necessary assurances, and) in May 2000, Baldwin was summoned to an interview with Oriali and Ghelfi, during which he was asked to assume all responsibilities of the passport charge Recoba and even in its own name its performance. This attempt to Baldwin's involvement on the part of the international would clearly have no logical justification, though he was limited to "hijack" Oriali to Krausz. Nor does it seem credible version defensive about the motivations of almost reverential respect which led Baldwin to accept the interview, however, the with representatives of the International. Based on the foregoing, the Commission considers that it should be declared the responsibility of Baldini, are fully tested the direct and conscious involvement in the creation of the offense and the effectiveness of causal put in place to achieve the end. LIABILITY FOR inter Mr. Rinaldo Ghelfi, CEO of the International Soc, is alleged participation in unlawful conduct initiated by the Society of its card holders, and Recoba Oriali in competition with Baldwin and with third parties who are not registered. Moreover, the findings of investigations carried out in the results of direct intervention in the affair Ghelfi until May 2000, when it had become public knowledge, the reports of possible irregularities concerning the achievement of the status of the Community by the Lazio player Veron. The Ghelfi, wanting to be sure that there were anomalies in the similar practice of Recoba, asked for clarification Oriali known and participated in the meeting with the same Oriali and Baldini. Ghelfi of such conduct, by itself, does not appear significant disciplinary action, either because they occurred in the period following the amendment of the "status" of Recoba, either because it lacks probative value as to the significant and unique Ghelfi awareness about the irregularity of the position of Recoba. On this occasion there are certainly strong doubts, since Oriali - not being active for the passport of Recoba as a mere staff - must have held upper management informed of the steps. The file shows that at least two times Oriali must have consulted with their superiors: the first when it comes to the "way" to practice in Argentina and the second when it came to perform on the advice of Krausz, the transfer of $ 80,000 , to be approved by top management. That said, it is clear that the request for payment of a sum relevant to the conduct of research documents could and perhaps should, lead to the leaders of the suspected irregularities and on the other hand the absence in the books of the Company a payment of that amount could mean that the settlement of compensation have been provided on a non-official, which would be a further indication of liabilities for dell'Oriali referents. According to the documents, however, can not be inferred that any circumstances refer to Ghelfi, so clear and unequivocal consent for the adoption of such decision, not being able to absolutely exclude the possibility that other entities have done so in those terms. The Commission therefore considers that Mr. Rinaldo Ghelfi should be acquitted of the charge. The Soc international meets and the work of its licensed Recoba Oriali under strict liability, which may not any evidence of the allegations made by the same good faith.
Free From the October 18, 2006
publish excerpts from the ruling of the Disciplinary Committee of the Football League for the "fake passport case Recoba, 27 June 2001 which established the following penalties: suspension until June 30, 2002 by Alvaro Recoba, inhibition until 30 June 2002 Gabriele Oriali, inhibition until 31 March 2002, Franco Baldini, in addition to a fine of two billion dollars for the Nerazzurri. But this is only the first act in the intricate story. The penalty for the player was confirmed by the Commission and federal appeals reduced to four months by the Chamber of Conciliation cones (fine for the company reduced to only 1.4 billion lire). On May 25, 2006 Recoba Oriali have bargained and six months' imprisonment (replaced by a fine of € 21,420) in a criminal court, rejected the request by the investigating magistrate of the Court of Udine. The survey, divided into several strands, thirty-one people were involved, including twelve players from AC Milan, Roma, Lazio, Sampdoria, Udinese and Vicenza. Www.legacalcio.it/comun/0001/cu507 on the site can be found, for all concerned with the matter, the official press release in its entirety.
The premise requires an examination of the substance in order be responsible for the subject-matter of this Commission, which may not directly relate to the authenticity or counterfeit passport of Italian football player Alvaro Recoba Rivero apparently issued by the Police in Rome November 9, 1998, as such a matter of course reserved for the criminal court. By the case circumstances arise unambiguous, consistent and incontrovertible that allow you to say (even apart from the relief, deduced from the documents acquired and shown in the act of referral, that the passport of Italian football is not never been issued by the Police in Rome) Recoba that had no title to the release of an Italian passport for absolute non-existence in the hands of the same prerequisites, first and foremost the right to Italian citizenship. At such a conclusion is reached, even at the moment of silence for any evidence and logical arguments that will be studied by examining the individual positions of the accused on the basis of only the statements made by the player Bureau surveys and the public prosecutor of Udine. In summary, Recoba said to have taken into account for the first time the possibility of becoming EU citizen on his return from the international after a period spent on loan at Venezia. On that occasion, he asked about your father who's pointed out that the family had "ancestors in the Canary Islands." Research in that direction, first by an aide to the prosecutor Casal, that Daniel Delgado, and then by a English law firm mandated by the International Soc, not arrived at any result: the fact Recoba reports that the search was "long and difficult." The player has also ruled out ever having played any practice or any request submitted tending to the release of an Italian passport. BENEFITS FOR ILLEGAL PLAYER does not have to spend more words to conclude that the Italian passport delivered to Recoba in Rome in September 1999 did not correspond to either the nationality of which the Uruguayan player was in possession of his birth or to the English that he might have been able to achieve "jure sanguinis", where the research conducted for the detection of Spain English ancestors had been successful. And subjectively it can also safely say that in no case the player could have confidence in the veracity "ideological" Italian passport that was delivered to Borghesiana dall'Oriali September 12, 1999. In general terms, and subject to the determination of individual responsibility, it is undeniable that the use of such a passport in order to obtain the change in federal status of the player, knowing that the document could not be genuine because citizenship is not incompatible with Recoba's Italian, constitutes a serious violation of the principles of loyalty, honesty and rectitude to which compliance is required all recipients of federal rules, as Article. 1 paragraph 1 of the CGS is to use means in fact incorrect, or even fraudulent, in order to obtain recognition of a security payable to, obtaining an unfair advantage. It is unnecessary to emphasize in this regard that the fact of becoming a "Community" has brought economic benefits not only is the player, at least in terms of absolute freedom of movement within the Federation of affiliated community, both to employer for better utilization of staff available (...). Passing the examination of individual positions, there is no doubt on the statement of responsibility for Alvaro Recoba Rivero. It has been said that the documents can not be inferred no valid reason that would allow the player to believe in authenticity of an Italian passport in question and, in particular, does not deserve any credit the assertion of Recoba, by claiming it has not detected the fault of the issue date of the document, almost a year earlier than at the time of delivery of same Oriali part of, or when he has not noticed that the passport had been given a residence in Rome never existed, much less when he said did not give any weight to the fact that the passport was applied to a photograph which he had no remember and that he was still having delivered to anyone. The involvement of BALDINI The defense argued that the conduct of Recoba parted should be considered in view of its inexperience and naivety, due to age youth, and the lack of knowledge on his part regarding any laws, regulations, administrative practices and bureaucratic, all these elements that show the ignorance about the unlawfulness of his affiliation as a federal city Community. According to the Commission the alleged unawareness of Recoba is irretrievably contradicted by the facts mentioned above, whose relevance can not be resisted and refused only on grounds of age of the player. And 'well-known fact, and the file shows that Recoba, though undeniably young, he has gained experience in various fields through travel and intercontinental travel, contract negotiations of economic contacts with prosecutors and sports activities also in the specific field of the acquisition of a particular nationality (see information at the request of his father, custody of a law firm to practice English). Therefore there Recoba in the intelligence, maturity and experience necessary to understand that passports do not materialize out of nowhere and that the transformation of its federal status in extra-Community was irregular. The shocking carelessness with which Recoba, although "astonished" that it had obtained an Italian passport, he has served as suited him acquire the status of the Community assume, in light of the above carried out, meaning a decisive evidence for the ascertainment of active and fully aware of the affiliated to the creation of the offense. As regards Mr. Gabriele Oriali the file shows that those at the beginning of cooperation with the international in June 1999, he learned that the Company had an interest in the change of status from non-EU Recoba in the Community and to that end had been interested in a English law firm, whose research had stalled, however, are practices that required complicated in any case, very long time. It is also clear that the Oriali Recoba was interested in the issue by taking concrete initiatives aimed at achieving change in the status of the player, by contacting the Baldini to know "as they did to Rome for passports and ask an indication of someone who could help change the international status" of Recoba. Baldini took the name of the Krausz (which he also already known), the Oriali was activated for the start of "practice", then follow the course until the end. He provided then deliver to Recoba, 12 September 1999, an Italian passport which had just been provided by Krausz. Paid dell'Oriali serious elements of the accusation, made up of facts and logical arguments deductible established by the acts, so precise, articulate and compelling responsibility to demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt. In particular: a) the Oriali was to receive a passport by Krausz. Before giving to Recoba, he was able to examine it and noted that the date of issue dates back to November 9, 1998, almost one year before the day of delivery. The fact is confirmed by Krausz, whose testimony is deemed reliable Investigations Bureau, to have been released voluntarily by a person not licensed and therefore not obliged to provide information to federal FIGC. The explanation for this anomaly, Krausz says that it provided all'Oriali ("Commenting on the fact that the passport was issued with an earlier date but I was explained by the fact that these are documents part of a group "devoted to specific cases") is symptomatic of dell'Oriali awareness regarding the irregularities in the issuing of passports b) Oriali also had occasion to note, looking at the passport, the document that Recoba was living in Rome, which was not to be false, and that the passport was applied a photograph of Recoba of which he "knew nothing", c) was to instruct the Oriali Krausz of holding the "practice" in Argentina and to authorize, after obtained the consent of the Company, payment of the sum of $ 80,000 alleged (see the statements on the verge of Krausz) by Liliana Rocca as a reward for obtaining passsaporto d) was the Oriali to promote a meeting with Baldwin, in the presence of Ghelfi, during which Baldwin was asked to take full responsibility for the operation, and to issue an invoice to your name cost "of the operation Recoba," and ) the Oriali, being aware of previous unsuccessful attempts carried out in Spain for the achievement of EU citizenship of the player, could not have confidence in the fairness and regularity of an Italian passport for Recoba obtained in Argentina from an unspecified "agency", in lightning-fast times to say the least, since he knew that by Recoba was not presented to the Italian authorities any request to issue a passport. Nor could he, based on logic and common experience, consider the series and based general insurance provided to him by Krausz and smoky, even by Baldini, that "everything was smooth." The statement dell'incolpato, he was not aware of the alleged illegality of the document and that he doubted the correctness of the persons to whom it was entrusted, on behalf of the International Soc, conducting the "practice" is reduced to a mere allegation no effective defensive response, which does not affect in any way the complete and convincing evidence assembled against him under. Must therefore be affirmed disciplinary liability of Mr. Gabriele Oriali. With regard to Mr. Franco Baldini is common ground in which these acts dall'Oriali was asked, who asked him if he knew a person in a position to verify the existence of the prerequisites for change of status from non-EU Recoba in the Community. The Baldini would show the Krausz (who already knew personally Oriali) is considered suitable to the task because they had previously dealt with similar events, and because of that his wife worked with a law firm in Argentina. After having addressed the Oriali Krausz, the Baldini would no longer directly involved in the case, merely on a few occasions to act as intermediaries between Krausz and Oriali, since the same had difficulty contacting each other. The defense argued that the marginal activity Baldini, limitatasi the "presentation" to Oriali Krausz (except for sporadic and insignificant actions of a mere link between the two) it would exclude the involvement in the case of the passport Recoba. The Commission notes that the documents are illustrated numerous and consistent circumstances leading to the conviction that Baldini had a role in the story much more relevant and easy to efficientedi through. In particular: a) between Baldini and Krausz, there was a relationship, in the sense that the former had offered the second in a time of economic difficulty, the opportunity to collaborate with his office, having lived in Argentina where un'argentina married, b) Baldini, precisely because of the relationship described above, was well aware of the nature of the practices carried out by Krausz in Argentina, the inconsistency of the vaunted knowledge and experience in agencies and consulates and touted as possible action by the wife in the role of collaborators a law firm (the Krausz said he found the address of a "serious agency" through leaflets distributed for publicity purposes, in front of a Consulate and never made any mention of an involvement of his wife the story), c) the file shows that Baldwin was an ongoing point of reference for the conduct of "practice" by providing to the documentation for Recoba Krausz, the sorting and fax communications between Oriali Krausz and finally - a fact somewhat symptomatic - talking to Oriali, about 45/60 days after first contact, that the research was positive and that everything was in place for the Community to become Recoba - Al regarding the alleged diffi CT telephone contact between the Oriali Krausz and Krausz are not credible because the reports that he telephoned directly to Oriali to keep him informed of developments in practice on several occasions, not least regarding the request of the bank. One can deduce logically that the important news, as was undoubtedly that of "completion of the research," had to go through the Baldini and remain with the latter communicate all'Oriali d) Oriali turned to Baldini Krausz and not to ensure that "everything was regular and Baldini was to provide the necessary assurances, and) in May 2000, Baldwin was summoned to an interview with Oriali and Ghelfi, during which he was asked to assume all responsibilities of the passport charge Recoba and even in its own name its performance. This attempt to Baldwin's involvement on the part of the international would clearly have no logical justification, though he was limited to "hijack" Oriali to Krausz. Nor does it seem credible version defensive about the motivations of almost reverential respect which led Baldwin to accept the interview, however, the with representatives of the International. Based on the foregoing, the Commission considers that it should be declared the responsibility of Baldini, are fully tested the direct and conscious involvement in the creation of the offense and the effectiveness of causal put in place to achieve the end. LIABILITY FOR inter Mr. Rinaldo Ghelfi, CEO of the International Soc, is alleged participation in unlawful conduct initiated by the Society of its card holders, and Recoba Oriali in competition with Baldwin and with third parties who are not registered. Moreover, the findings of investigations carried out in the results of direct intervention in the affair Ghelfi until May 2000, when it had become public knowledge, the reports of possible irregularities concerning the achievement of the status of the Community by the Lazio player Veron. The Ghelfi, wanting to be sure that there were anomalies in the similar practice of Recoba, asked for clarification Oriali known and participated in the meeting with the same Oriali and Baldini. Ghelfi of such conduct, by itself, does not appear significant disciplinary action, either because they occurred in the period following the amendment of the "status" of Recoba, either because it lacks probative value as to the significant and unique Ghelfi awareness about the irregularity of the position of Recoba. On this occasion there are certainly strong doubts, since Oriali - not being active for the passport of Recoba as a mere staff - must have held upper management informed of the steps. The file shows that at least two times Oriali must have consulted with their superiors: the first when it comes to the "way" to practice in Argentina and the second when it came to perform on the advice of Krausz, the transfer of $ 80,000 , to be approved by top management. That said, it is clear that the request for payment of a sum relevant to the conduct of research documents could and perhaps should, lead to the leaders of the suspected irregularities and on the other hand the absence in the books of the Company a payment of that amount could mean that the settlement of compensation have been provided on a non-official, which would be a further indication of liabilities for dell'Oriali referents. According to the documents, however, can not be inferred that any circumstances refer to Ghelfi, so clear and unequivocal consent for the adoption of such decision, not being able to absolutely exclude the possibility that other entities have done so in those terms. The Commission therefore considers that Mr. Rinaldo Ghelfi should be acquitted of the charge. The Soc international meets and the work of its licensed Recoba Oriali under strict liability, which may not any evidence of the allegations made by the same good faith.
0 comments:
Post a Comment